The rapid spread of unmanned aerial vehicles and loitering munitions has created a new class of threats for critical infrastructure, especially for facilities that depend on uninterrupted operation and contain exposed roof and wall assemblies. In such an environment, the design of protective systems can no longer focus only on conventional lateral threats or on isolated single-impact scenarios. Instead, it must address repeated fragmentation exposure, localized cumulative damage, and the need to preserve functionality after attack. This paper develops a standalone conference contribution based primarily on the ballistic material evaluation presented in Chapter 5 of the source study. The text focuses on the structural characteristics, test response, and engineering applicability of rigid glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) panels and flexible Twaron T730 aramid systems for infrastructure protection. Two GFRP panels with nominal thicknesses of 12.2 mm and 14 mm were evaluated under ballistic loading, while rear-face deformation was measured by laser profilometry and internal damage was assessed using digital radiography. In parallel, a multilayer Twaron T730 aramid configuration was used as a comparative flexible barrier system. The results confirm that rigid GFRP panels provide stable mechanical resistance, controlled rear-face deformation, and a low probability of catastrophic penetration under the tested conditions. The radiographic evaluation further shows that internal damage zones can significantly exceed visibly damaged areas, highlighting the importance of non-destructive inspection for reliable post-impact assessment. The aramid system demonstrates favorable energy absorption under moderate impact loading, but it also reaches its limits under repeated higher-energy events. Based on the combined results, the paper argues that rigid composite panels are the most suitable primary protective element for large-area infrastructure applications, while aramid systems are best employed as supplementary internal layers or as part of a hybrid configuration. The findings are discussed in relation to roof protection, multi-hit resistance, modular retrofitting, and the practical design of protective envelopes for critical infrastructure exposed to fragmentation hazards.
This paper examines how uncrewed platforms and contemporary sensor suites may extend engineer reconnaissance of water obstacles in support of river-crossing planning. The paper combines a structured review of Czech doctrinal practice and candidate sensor-platform combinations with a field experiment carried out on a selected section of the River Svratka, using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-borne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), UAV-borne ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) control points. The combined evaluation indicates that LiDAR is highly effective for bank geometry and approach assessment, whereas GPR can complement it by indicating the longitudinal bed profile and sediment interfaces, albeit with greater interpretative uncertainty.
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been developed for military purposes and are therefore particularly advanced and developed in military aviation. Under the circumstances, UAVs and drones are used these days not only in the military but also in the civilian industry.
Based on the chosen research objective and problems the questionnaire survey method was selected. There was collected primary data which was processed by software using a computer-based statistical analysis program.
Next analysis, which solve in part about goals and objectives was the experts’ evaluation method based on experts’ surveyed sample analysis. The Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W) was selected for experts’ data analysis. The statistical software package SPSS version 26 was used for the collected experts’ data analysis and for the hierarchical clustering analysis as well [11].