This study explores whether simulator-derived workload metrics can indicate differences in performance between ATC student cohorts. A standardized radar simulation was conducted with 14 participants (7 fourth-year, 7 fifth-year). Workload was modeled using event-based HUM-SIM principles and combined with instructor evaluation. The results suggest higher workload exposure, longer critical states, and greater deviation from the planned scenario in less experienced students. Differences appear not only in workload magnitude but in its temporal regulation. These findings indicate that workload-informed metrics may support objective performance assessment in simulator-based training, although further validation on larger datasets is required.
This pilot study evaluates projection-based and virtual reality visualization in flight simulation using objective performance metrics and NASA-TLX workload assessment. A within-subject design with eight pilot students was used to verify a segment-based evaluation framework. Results indicate that virtual reality supports more stable control with lower variability, while projection-based display enables higher accuracy relative to predefined targets. Workload remained low to moderate in both conditions. The findings suggest that visualization modality influences control strategy and support the suitability of the proposed methodology for further research and application in simulation-based pilot training.